#Toyota spyder manual#
And, while we’d recommend going with a manual transmission car (pretty much just on principle), if you do opt for the sequential manual keep in mind that it’s a more complex beast and thus more prone to malfunction. Some owners have also reported engines burning a significant amount of oil, so be conscious of that as well according to the same forum post, this is more common in 2003 and older cars. Issues with the pre-cat system can ultimately cause damage to the engine, so consider buying a car where the pre-cat system has been removed or doesn’t show signs of failing. This problem is apparently more common in model years ranging from 2000 to 2003 (though a possibility in younger cars). This system is comprised of ceramic internals that can become brittle and disintegrate over time, sending debris into the main catalytic converter, and reducing exhaust flow and power at higher RPM. Some owners on forums have reported problems with the “pre-cat” system.
Potential Issuesīecause the Spyder’s engine was basically a mass-market economy car engine from an automaker known for reliability there isn’t a ton to worry about, but there are a few points of concern. Either way, the Spyder had a claimed 0-60 time of 7.2 seconds, so while it wasn’t exactly a powerhouse, by all accounts its fun to push to the limit, like a Miata or Toyota GT86. To be clear, this not an automatic with a manual mode like many modern transmissions it’s a sequential manual (thus no H-pattern) with an automatic clutch and no third pedal. That came coupled to your choice of either a traditional five-speed manual transmission or a six-speed automated manual transmission. It is, essentially, a slightly more powerful version of the 1ZZ engine you’d find in a Corolla or most other Toyota’s from the time. Unlike previous versions of the MR2, the Spyder only came with one engine, and it was a modest one: the 1ZZ-FED, a 1.8-liter naturally-aspirated four cylinder. Still, there’s no getting around the MR2’s handling prowess. According to the author, Matt Stone, “When pushed, the MR2 tends to pivot more around its mid-point when the back comes around to the left, the front is moving to the right at the same time, as if a big push pin were stuck right through the floor… this is an amazingly sophisticated chassis, considering its price.” Stone went on to praise the car’s responsive steering and feel, though ultimately he said he thought the Miata was ultimately more fun. Performance-wise, a 2001 Motor Trend review pitted it head to head with the Miata and found it to outperform in acceleration, braking and in a slalom. This, according to Car and Driver, helped provide a more stable handling experience than the two previous iterations of the MR2 that were notoriously prone to snap-oversteer. It was a couple inches shorter than the NB, but has a wheelbase more than seven inches longer, its wheels pushed as far the corners as possible. Though the MR2 had less horsepower from its naturally aspirated inline-four (138 hp compared to the Miata’s 140), it was around 150 pounds lighter, proving an even better power-to-weight ratio than the golden standard for small sports cars. Let’s consider the MR2 Spyder next to is contemporary from the time, the NB Miata.
Before you do, though, here’s everything you should know. There’s a good chance more people will catch on to that fact, so it’s worth considering buying one now while you can still get it dirt cheap. Modern safety regulations would never really allow for that. There wasn’t another small, affordable mid-engine sports car that came after it and there probably never will be. Moreso, we have yet to become truly nostalgic for the Spyder’s era, not in the way we have for sports cars of the ’80s and ’90s.īut the MR2 Spyder was the end of an era. There was no artificially aspirated version, either, unlike the first gen that was made available with a supercharger and the second gen that got a turbo. It forewent the iconic pop-up headlights for big, sort of frog-like headlamps and the roof was done away with completely (no t-tops here). The Spyder is the unloved son of the bunch and there are probably a few reasons for that. No, I’m talking about the MR2 Spyder, the oft-forgotten third generation MR2 produced from 2000 to 2007. You’re close, but both aren’t as reliable as you’d think and they’re increasingly becoming expensive collector’s items.
You might think I’m talking about the first or second generation MR2. What if I told you that you could buy a reliable, mid-engine sports car for just a few thousand dollars? You might think I’m talking about the Pontiac Fiero (and point and laugh).
0 kommentar(er)
